The Children’s Law Clinic, in partnership with staff and parent researchers of the Education Justice Alliance (EJA), released a report on the use of early grade suspension in North Carolina. Early grade suspension is the practice of suspending young children from school for disciplinary reasons. Each year, North Carolina public schools suspend thousands of young children in pre-Kindergarten through 2nd grade despite no evidence that shows these suspensions are effective at stopping misbehavior or making schools safer. These suspensions can have long-term negative impacts on young children and disproportionately impact vulnerable groups, including Black and Native children and children with disabilities.
The report (Community Report: Too Young To Suspend) examines the practice of suspending young children in North Carolina, summarizing research on the practice, highlighting local and statewide suspension data for K-2nd grade students, and reviewing the perspectives of directly impacted parents. The report also looks at policy efforts by states and local school districts to limit the use of early grade suspension. Finally, the report outlines overall findings and recommendations for reducing early grade suspension in North Carolina, emphasizing the importance of community involvement and ongoing data collection, monitoring, and oversight.
This report was made possible thanks to generous funding from The Duke Endowment, the Duke Office of Durham & Community Affairs, the Duke School of Medicine and the School of Nursing, and the Duke Office of the Provost.
The Children’s Law Clinic has released a new report that sheds light on discipline trends in North Carolina’s charter schools. The report, which is the first of its kind to focus specifically on charter school discipline in the state, revealed several key findings relating to the use of suspension among charters. It also uncovered correlations between the racial demographics of charter schools and their use of suspension. Clinic students Ryan Yang ’21 and Richard Yang ’22 drafted the report under the supervision of Supervising Attorney Peggy Nicholson.
The Children’s Law Clinic has released a report, School Vouchers in North Carolina, 2014 – 2020. It presents a detailed six-year review of the program, which provides taxpayer-funded scholarships to low and moderate-income students to assist with the payment of tuition at private schools. Included are up-to-date facts and figures about the cost, participation, academic outcomes, and evaluation of the program, as well as a program analysis and recommendations. The report points out the success of the program in providing a government subsidy to parents who prefer religious education for their children, but also reveals that the program has no accountability to the taxpayers who fund it. Due to the program’s design, the public has no window into whether the voucher program promotes academic progress or leaves the participating children far behind those who attend public schools.
Most homeschooled children in North Carolina get a good education from their parents. A few don’t. Under the current state law, those homeschooled whose education is neglected by their parents have no protection. This report, Protecting Homeschoolers, makes a modest proposal for a law change to protect homeschooled children in North Carolina from educational neglect.
The Duke Children’s Law Clinic has produced a comprehensive Guide for parents of children with special education needs. The Guide explains the special education law in clear terms so that parents can learn the vocabulary, navigate the special education system, and become an effective advocate for their children. The Guide is especially geared to assist North Carolina parents.
This report, issued by the Children’s Law Clinic, documents the practices of school districts in North Carolina as they affect the enrollment of immigrant children in the public schools. While the law is clear that immigrant children who live in North Carolina, including undocumented immigrant children, have a constitutional right to attend public school, our research showed that not all public school districts are meeting their obligations to facilitate the enrollment of immigrant children.
G-1SBD3JS75Q G-1SBD3JS75Q