Fall Symposium – Gun Rights and Regulation Outside the Home

The Center for Firearms Law will be hosting its fall symposium on Friday, September 27, 2019.  The title (and theme) is Gun Rights & Regulation Outside the Home. The event is free and open to the public.

The lineup for the symposium includes many distinguished scholars who study the Second Amendment from legal, empirical, and historical perspectives. Panel discussions will include topics such as the relation of Second Amendment rights and other constitutional values, historical regulations on magazines and silencers, empirical assessments of stand your ground and concealed carry laws, and the early understanding of rights discourse, among others.

More information about the speakers and schedule is available here.

Announcing the Center’s Research Affiliate Program

We are extremely excited to announce the Research Affiliate Program (“RAP”), a new initiative of the Center for Firearms Law. The program is designed to support junior and aspiring scholars, including current graduate students, post-docs, visiting or adjunct faculty, and practitioners as they develop research and scholarship on firearms law. These nonresident affiliations are open to individuals studying firearms law, broadly defined, and working in the legal profession or in history, political science, public policy, or related fields.

Affiliates will receive a stipend to cover research-related costs, access to Duke resources, and connections with the Center’s network. During the initial phase, we expect to have 1-2 affiliates for a term of 9-12 months.

We start accepting applications Sunday, September 1st! You can find more information about the Center, the RAP, and how to apply here:

Firearms Law Workshop Mini-Symposium, Part VII: The Right to Keep and Bear Arms Outside the Second Amendment

The Second Amendment protects an individual right to keep and bear arms.  But, under the Constitution, that right is circumscribed.  It is not “a right to keep and carry any weapon whatsoever in any manner whatsoever and for whatever purpose.” Nor does the Second Amendment impose limits on private parties’ authority to restrict firearms on their own property, on local governments’ power to regulate secondary effects of firearms-related activity (e.g. noise levels), or on the remedies available to private plaintiffs in a civil lawsuit arising from firearms-related harm. The Constitution simply sets a floor on the scope of the right to keep and bear arms.

Firearms Law Workshop Mini-Symposium, Part VI: Guns in the Private Square

When Americans go out in public, they may encounter civilians carrying guns either openly or concealed.  For some, this is a scary thought, for others, a reassuring one.  But regardless of where they stand on the issue, most Americans assume that whether their day to day lives will be awash in guns will primarily be determined by politics and specifically where their state and local politicians stand on gun control and gun rights.  But is that really true?

Firearms Law Workshop Mini-Symposium, Part IV: Regulation, Not Rights: the Early History of a National Firearms Industry

It should be no surprise that today some of the biggest gun companies are in New England, where the government fostered the development of firearms manufacturing. These include Colt’s Manufacturing Company LLC (Hartford, CT), Smith and Wesson (Springfield, MA), and Sturm, Ruger & Co., Inc., (Southport, CT). Although discussions of gun culture today tend to focus on the Second Amendment, we should consider the origins of the government’s intervention in the arms industry, a history that involves regulating the types of firearms manufacturers brought to the market. By understanding the precise ways the federal government fostered the emergence of an industry that is dependent on both military conflict and a civilian gun culture, we can point to the ways the government is obligated to regulate it. It is more than a Second Amendment issue; it is a safety regulation issue.

Firearms Law Workshop Mini-Symposium, Part III: Framing the Second Amendment: Gun Rights, Civil Rights, and Civil Liberties

How we label, characterize, and frame constitutional rights matters. In gun rights discourse, advocates and commentators have referred to the Second Amendment as a “collective,” “civic republican,” “individual,” and “fundamental” right. Gun rights advocates have defended the right to keep and bear arms on “law and order” and anti-tyranny grounds, while gun control proponents have urged regulation based on “public health,” “human rights,” and other concerns. These concepts, vocabularies, and frames have significantly influenced how advocates and institutions have debated, interpreted, and enforced the right to keep and bear arms.

Firearms Law Workshop Mini-Symposium, Part II: Gun Politics in Blue

August 14 was a terrifying day for Philadelphia. For seven hours, Philadelphia police officers engaged in a hostage standoff with a suspect armed with an illegally possessed AR-15 and handgun. The incident left six police officers injured. Since then, calls for gun control have surged both from within the law enforcement community and on behalf of it. The Major Cities Chiefs Association, which represents chiefs like LAPD’s Michel Moore, called for a renewed assault weapons ban; Philadelphia Mayor Jim Kenney demanded gun control to “Help our police officers. Help our clergy. Help our kids.”

Firearms Law Workshop Mini-Symposium, Part I: Going Gunless

I returned home to Houston from the workshop at the Duke Center for Firearms Law on Saturday morning, and reached my home just as the news reports broke from El Paso about the massacre at the Wal Mart there.  When I woke up the next morning, there were news reports about a similar atrocity in Dayton, OH.  The same weekend, the city of Chicago had 52 shootings (numerous separate incidents), with seven fatalities, its deadliest weekend so far in 2019.  Mt. Sinai Hospital had to divert ambulances to other trauma centers because it reached its maximum capacity.

Mini-Symposium on the First Firearms Law Works-in-Progress Workshop

After our tremendously engaging first (of what we hope will be many) Firearms Law Works-in-Progress Workshops, we are excited to have a group of those who presented drafts at the workshop blogging about their pieces. As Joseph highlighted in his retrospective on the event, these papers were eclectic and generated fascinating discussion.

During this week and next, we will be publishing one post each day in which the author briefly describes the nature of their project. (I’ll post on the draft that I discussed at the conference, as well.)

  • Dru Stevenson, Professor Law, South Texas College of Law
  • Jennifer Carlson, Associate Professor of Sociology, University of Arizona
  • Timothy Zick, John Marshall Professor of Government and Citizenship and Cabell Research Professor, William & Mary Law School
  • Lindsay Schakenbach Regele, Robert H. and Nancy J. Blayney Professor of History, Miami University of Ohio
  • Nicholas Mosvick, Assistant Professor, Adjunct Faculty, Christopher Newport University
  • Cody Jacobs, Lecturer, Boston University School of Law
  • Jake Charles, Executive Director, Duke Center for Firearms Law

Thanks to all the participants in the workshop, including not only the presenters, but also the stellar senior scholars who moderated panels, questioned assumptions, and provided crucial feedback on these and other projects.

Scholarship Highlight: James B. Jacobs & Zoe Fuhr, “The Toughest Gun Control Law in the Nation” (NYU Press 2019)

Yesterday, amici filed briefs in support of the City in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association Inc. v. City of New York—the Second Amendment case that many thought (and some still think) might be a blockbuster. (Full disclosure: Along with Darrell Miller and Eric Ruben, I submitted an amicus brief in support of neither side.) There is much to say about the implications for the future of the Second Amendment, but the strange saga of NYSRPA so far also raises interesting questions about the law and politics surrounding New York’s gun laws.